<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Redhat vs IBM Archives - Linux Windows and android Tutorials</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.osradar.com/tag/redhat-vs-ibm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.osradar.com</link>
	<description>tutorials and news and Seurity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2019 09:21:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.8.12</generator>
	<item>
		<title>IBM Best Placed to Protect and Support Fedora Linux and CentOS</title>
		<link>https://www.osradar.com/acquisition-of-red-hat-makes-ibm-best-placed-to-protect-and-support-fedora-linux-and-centos/</link>
					<comments>https://www.osradar.com/acquisition-of-red-hat-makes-ibm-best-placed-to-protect-and-support-fedora-linux-and-centos/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2019 07:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Redhat vs IBM]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.osradar.com/?p=11044</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>When I first read the story published to the Wall Street Journal newspaper on IBM acquiring Red Hat, like many of my fellow Linux geeks, I was shocked. It read like an April Fools’ Day joke story. I now have to admit, it took a few minutes to digest the news. But I soon come [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.osradar.com/acquisition-of-red-hat-makes-ibm-best-placed-to-protect-and-support-fedora-linux-and-centos/">IBM Best Placed to Protect and Support Fedora Linux and CentOS</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.osradar.com">Linux  Windows and android  Tutorials</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I first read the story published to the Wall Street Journal newspaper on IBM<br />
acquiring Red Hat, like many of my fellow Linux geeks, I was shocked. It read like<br />
an April Fools’ Day joke story. I now have to admit, it took a few minutes to<br />
digest the news. But I soon come to accept that this was actually going to happen.<br />
The Linux community was wise to ponder the question of what could be the possible<br />
interest IBM has in Red Hat that warrants such a large takeover, amounting to US$34<br />
billion.<br />
IBM want exclusive access to Red Hat’s extensive and advanced cloud software. They<br />
make no secret of this and it’s outlined in the original Press Release which<br />
announced the acquisition. IBM Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer<br />
Ginni Rometty said, “The acquisition of Red Hat is a game-changer. It changes<br />
everything about the cloud market,” and “IBM will become the world’s #1 hybrid<br />
cloud provider, offering companies the only open cloud solution that will unlock<br />
the full value of the cloud for their businesses.”.<br />
IBM are proud to tout their long history supporting Linux while noting their<br />
previous history of collaborating with Red Hat. IBM have been in the game a very<br />
long time and were early supporters of the Linux platform in the corporate sector.<br />
IBM integrating the portfolio of Red Hat into that of IBM will, once complete,<br />
create one powerhouse of a player in the crowded cloud market.<br />
It’s pretty safe to assume that there will not be any major alterations to Red Hat<br />
Enterprise Linux (RHEL). It is a crucial part of the Red Hat portfolio and there<br />
can be no benefit to IBM discontinuing its support and development. A re-branding<br />
to better acknowledge IBM could be justified, but the core source code will remain<br />
much the same.<br />
The Linux community is still worried that once the acquisition has passed the<br />
regulators and finalized, IBM will decide to drop development and funding for the<br />
Fedora Linux and CentOS projects. If the projects are left without their major<br />
injection of funds which has been traditionally provided by Red Hat, it will then<br />
be left to the community to find a viable funding solution. If that were to occur,<br />
it could be a big problem as there is already a flooded market of Linux<br />
distributors all fighting for funding dollars. Adding more to the mix and expecting<br />
the community to come to the rescue just might not be enough to save both Fedora<br />
Linux and CentOS. So can they both survive under IBM? We think so.</p>
<p>In an <a href="https://www.osradar.com/redhat-said-yes-to-ibm/">article published to OSRadar on October 29, 2018</a> written by my colleague<br />
Brett Brennan, assured that Fedora Linux and CentOS are integral parts of the Red<br />
Hat ecosystem in that they provide the inventive spark for extensions to compete<br />
with Ubuntu and SUSE. IBM will almost certainly continue their support and possibly</p>
<p>even increase it, while continuing to embrace the wider benefits the the open-<br />
source community of developers can offer.</p>
<p>Remember, IBM already offers many variations of Unix/Linux operating systems for<br />
IBM mainframes: AIX &#8211; developed off of the AT&amp;T Unix source code in the mid-to-late<br />
1980s. z/OS – a more recent development from IBM that emerged in the early 2000s.<br />
z/VSE – a widely adopted system designed for secure online transactions and batch<br />
workloads. z/TPF – a sophisticated system aimed to deliver very high transaction<br />
volumes at near real-time. Linux on Z and z/VM – these services are not operating<br />
systems in a traditional sense, it’s the IBM Z Linux platform and hypervisor,<br />
respectively. This enables open-source Linux distributions to take full advantage<br />
of IBM’s mainframe capabilities, while the hypervisor can run thousands of Linux on<br />
Z virtual machines on one mainframe and can host z/OS, z/VSE and z/TPF systems too.<br />
When you look at the advanced options that IBM already offers to complement their Z<br />
mainframes, it does become crystal clear that IBM didn&#8217;t acquire Red Hat because it<br />
needed an operating system. That is a certainty.</p>
<p>As has already been pointed out before, Red Hat to IBM is a strategic business<br />
investment that adds to IBM&#8217;s portfolio, and takes Red Hat preemptively out-of-play<br />
for potential acquisition by Oracle, Microsoft, Alphabet or Facebook. IBM is<br />
actually placed in a very good position to protect Red Hat and guarantee support<br />
for its entire portfolio, rather than drop anything, which has been the leading<br />
worry of the Linux community. Still, the discontent continues to bubble like soup.<br />
One possible factor triggering the discontent – and my colleague Brett Brennan<br />
touched on this in the aforementioned article &#8211; could be the Linus Torvalds</p>
<p>meltdown that called into question the stability of licenses in the free and open-<br />
source community. You can argue until your heart bleeds dry whether Linus’ meltdown</p>
<p>was justified or a complete overreaction and somewhat reflection of his personality<br />
and automatic defense mechanism to all potential and sometimes non-existent threats<br />
to Linux. I guess it’s his right to defend his creation, so he should not be<br />
crucified for it. Whatever your assessment of his tirade, there can be no doubt<br />
that Linus Torvalds hold significant influence over the Linux community hoards. To<br />
some, he’s a God worthy of worship. But remember IBM has ownership of much of the<br />
old AT&amp;T Unix source code and patents, so if any licenses of Linux any components<br />
is challenged, then IBM has the legal expertise and resources to defend, motivation<br />
amplified further by its acquisition of Red Hat.<br />
Given the questions over license control, ongoing support for development – IBM and<br />
Red Hat combined make huge contributions to Linux development &#8211; and their need for<br />
hybrid cloud technology extensions and revenue drawn from contract support, IBM&#8217;s<br />
acquisition of Red Hat actually makes perfect sense and should be considered a<br />
protective measure to preserve one of the world&#8217;s most recognizable and respected<br />
platforms of Linux against legal and financial challenges. Since the community<br />
projects of Fedora Linux and CentOS are identified as such integral slices to the<br />
Red Hat pie, support for them must surely continue. Red Hat actually benefits<br />
massively from the community developers that make Fedora Linux and CentOS possible<br />
and it would be reckless for IBM to throw away those free benefits, which come with<br />
potentially high reward.<br />
IBM has been around the blocks of Silicon Valley for a very long time. Before it<br />
was even dubbed “Silicon Valley”, actually. The company’s habits of developing and<br />
buying technology which will support the long-term viability of their existing<br />
portfolio is one of the key factors of why they are still around today and remain one of the most crucial and influential companies. IBM may not have the college-<br />
esque flare or reputation of cool that some of the more recent entries to Silicon</p>
<p>Valley have fostered, but IBM has the respect. Their expertise in an industry they<br />
helped shape, goes unmatched. Mainframes are an integral part of their business and<br />
company earnings. Mainframes have been the core of IBM for over 50 years and remain<br />
the core today. It’s difficult to pinpoint where the shift away from mainframes<br />
started, but it is slow and it is gradual. However, mainframes will remain the core<br />
of IBM business for as long as we can see and they do it better than any of their<br />
competitors. Everything, and I mean everything, IBM now develop and acquire is<br />
centered around integration with existing technology which almost always come back<br />
to its mainframes. IBM’s focus on hybrid cloud services and increased integration<br />
will extend out to the portfolio of Red Hat, which is also very extensive in its<br />
own right.<br />
IBM was founded in 1911, over 100 years ago. It’s a century plus old company. They<br />
service 177 countries and have 367,000 employees. To put the figures into<br />
perspective and to really appreciate the corporate power of IBM, we compare it to<br />
Oracle which has 137,000 employees, Microsoft has 135,000, Alphabet has 99,000 and<br />
Facebook has 30,000.<br />
(Employee figures are not precise and are rounded off to simplify context for<br />
illustration purposes.)</p>
<p>IBM is truly one of the darlings of Silicon Valley, yet is absolutely under-appreciated for its value to the technology sector and often goes without recognition for the advances in research and development they continue to make, almost silently in the background and with minimal public attention. IBM was huge before. Its acquisition just made it even more huge. That’s why the industry continues to refer to the company as “Big Blue”.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.osradar.com/acquisition-of-red-hat-makes-ibm-best-placed-to-protect-and-support-fedora-linux-and-centos/">IBM Best Placed to Protect and Support Fedora Linux and CentOS</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.osradar.com">Linux  Windows and android  Tutorials</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.osradar.com/acquisition-of-red-hat-makes-ibm-best-placed-to-protect-and-support-fedora-linux-and-centos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
